Logic According to Husserl Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Logic According to Husserl - Essay Example It helped us to predict the existence of certain things which were unknown to us earlier. Husserl defined logic in a different manner. He has attached various dimensions to logic in order to analyze it comprehensively. According to Husserl â€Å"Logic is the science of science† (Husserl p.8). This paper analyses the arguments of Husserl with respect to logic and transcendental logic along with his criticisms against formal logic. â€Å"Logic, as Husserl sees it, is concerned in the first place with meanings (propositions, concepts) and with associated meaning-instantiating acts. Most importantly, it is concerned with that sort of deductively closed collection of meanings which constitutes a scientific theory†(Corazzon). In other words, Husserl pointed out that logic helps us to deduce certain scientific theories which were unknown to us earlier. He has pointed out that science has no existence without logic. All scientific theories were evolved out of logical thinking. For example, we assume that electrons revolve around certain nucleus in which protons and neutrons are located. This scientific theory is formulated based on logic rather than experimental conclusions. The stability of an atom can be explained only with the help of such an atom model described above. In other words, logic helped us to device a new scientific theory. ... For example, until recent times, science educated us that no object can move faster than light. However, some of the recent scientific discoveries are pointing towards the existence of a particle which is capable of moving much rapidly than light. Many of the basic scientific theories such as Einstein’s relativity theory may undergo modifications because of the new discovery. In other words, logic and science need not provide us correct explanations always. â€Å"The central position of the theory of judgement in the total problematic of formal logic is due to material as well as historic grounds†(Husserl and Landgrebe, p. 12). For example, we predict the arrival of different seasons based on historic facts. Historically, December is the coldest month at many parts of the world. So, people always expect December to be the coldest month in coming years also. Formal logic forces us to think in that manner. However, because of global warming problems, climate changes are t aking place everywhere in the world. Unexpected rains and droughts are taking place everywhere now. Under such circumstances, it is quite possible that the coming months of December may not be as cold as it before. In other words, formal logic may not provide us true information always. â€Å"Formal logic does not inquire into the differences in the mode of pre-givenness of objects. It enquires only into the conditions of self-evident judging†(Husserl and Landgrebe, p. 21). It should be noted that formal logic is the self-interpretation of reasons and therefore it is highly subjective. No two individuals are alike either physically or intellectually. Because of the differences in intelligence, different people formulate reasons differently. For

Business organization Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Business organization - Assignment Example The structure of organisation can be of four types namely, functional, horizontal, divisional and that of matrix. The functional structure is also recognised as ‘vertical dimension’. This kind of organisation is based on people who have the power to make decision in the organisation. The ‘span of control’ is the vital part in this type of organisation. The span of control can be recognised as the number of employees who have the power to give report to the boss inside the organisational hierarchy. This is based on the status and management system of the organisation (Fontaine, 2007). The status plays important role in this organisational structure. As there are many hierarchical levels it is quite difficult for lower level employee or manager to report to high level person with high status because each level has its own rules and regulations. The decision making process is quite slow as the communication has to pass through different levels of the organisation and approval is needed in every level. The interaction between high level managers and employees is less compared to flat organisational structure. Higher cost is required in tall structure because the decision making process is too slow. As the managers have limited workers under them, they can supervise or train them more effectively. In tall structure there is opportunity of improvement or promotion in career. For example, General Motors, an American automotive manufacturing company has tall organisation structure. It has almost 12–16 levels between the top to the bottom level. Thus, the managers in General Motors have ‘narrow span of control’ i.e. there is approximately 5–6 workers who can give statement to any individual manager. A large number of organizational levels can lead to job insecurity of workers and loss of professional skill (Fontaine, 2007). Flat organisational structure: In this organisational structure, there is less hierarchical level. Thus, the manager possess ‘wide span of control’. The manager builds good social relationship and establishes friendly environment which can confer power to the staffs. Source: (Fontaine, 2007). Flat organisational structure assists in higher level of interaction between staffs and managers. Thus, the process of communication is usually faster, reliable and much efficient compared to tall organisation structure. The leaders tend to be more democratic in nature and thus it leads to superior level of innovation. This type of organisational structure is more elastic and compliant compared to taller structure. The decision is not based on the status of the manager. It is based on need of the people. The employees possess more power to arrive at a decision instantly. Faster decision provides the organisation, high level of liveliness and mobility. The flat